Tag Archive for 'FDA'

FDA panel recommends decreased acetaminophen doses

On June 30, a federal advisory panel voted to propose a ban on Percocet and Vicodin, which are two of the most desired painkillers. The reason for this ban is because of the harmful effects that they can have on the liver.

A combination of a narcotic and acetaminophen is found in these two drugs. Acetaminophen is the ingredient that is found in common over-the-counter products such as Tylenol and Excedrin. Large amounts of acetaminophen are a leading cause of liver damage. The panel mentioned that patients who take Percocet and Vicodin for extended periods of time ususally need more and more increased doses. The panel’s vote, which arose out of a meeting to advise the FDA on problems stemming from the increasing popularity of acetaminophen, was 20-17 to recommend a ban on the combination drugs.

In 2005, 28 billion doses that contain acetaminophen were bought by American consumers. Every year, there are more than 400 people that die and 42,000 who are hospitalized from overdoses in the U.S.

There are at least 7 other prescription drugs in which acetaminophen is combined with different narcotics, and if the FDA listens to the expert’s advice, all of these combination pills will be banned. Vicodin and its generic equals are prescribed more than 100 million times annually in the United States.

The committee also voted 24-13 to suggest that the FDA decrease the highest allowed dose in o.t.c. medicine such as Tylenol from 500 milligrams to 325. They also voted 21-16 to bring down the maximum daily dosage to less than 4,000 milligrams.

Tylenol’s maker, Johnson & Johnson, said that it disagrees with the recommended restrictions on acetaminophen, saying that it might lead to even more dangerous results as people move towards other over-the-counter products such as Advil and aspirin.

Children’s medicines that contain acetaminophen were also an issue as the committee voted 36-1 to limit them to a single formulation. Currently the liquids are sold in two different concentrations, which confuses some doctors and parents. After deliberation, FDA officials indicated that they would probably decide on the less concentrated formula. That way, if parents make a mistake, there would be less chance of an overdose.

A lot of over-the-counter cold and cough medicines such as Excedrin and Nyquil contain acetaminophen. Accidental poisonings happen when two or more of these combination products are taken because the danger is not known. A vote of 24-13 was cast against the ban against these children’s medicines because the danger was perceived as slight.

A study done in 2005 showed that the majority of poisonings happened when people took Vicodin or similar products containing a narcotic with acetaminophen.

Why so many new food recalls?

Early this year we were cautioned against eating pistachios and peanut butter, and then in April, the FDA strongly suggested that we not eat raw alfalfa sprouts. Now we are warned about a specific brand of cookie dough.

If you think there seems to be more recalls, you’re right! There were 214 food recalls in 2006, 247 in 2007 and 310 in 2008 according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Surprisingly, food manufacturers say this is not bad, it’s actually a good thing. Dr. Robert Brackett, chief science and regulatory-affairs officer for the Grocery Manufacturers Association, says “It may look like the food supply is getting less safe, but it actually means that we’re getting better at detecting the outbreaks.” The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has figures that appear to uphold Brackett’s findings, which reveal the decrease of food-borne illnesses as the food recalls have increased in the past few years.

The FDA’s associate commissioner for food safety, Dr. David Acheson, reports that the agency is getting more diligent when it comes to finding health dangers before any illness is reported. Acheson gave an example of this by mentioning the pistachio recall, explaining that the nuts were taken off the shelves before anyone got ill.

Having said all this, there are some lawmakers that are still concerned that the FDA isn’t doing all they can, so they are working on a new bill that will tighten regulations. This legislation would force food manufacturers to closely follow the distribution of their products, as the FDA would make more numerous visits to food manufacturing plants.

There are now more challenges than in the past because of the worldwide distribution of the food supply. There are more chances for contamination because of more stops from the farm to the home. 

Recently, the FDA has opened offices in China and India to keep in closer contact with food producers there. Fortunately new advances in surveillance technology has allowed the CDC to be able to track the genetic fingerprint of food-borne illnesses all over the nation, which lets the FDA caution Americans more quickly when it comes to possible health risks.

This said, even though there is increased oversight, the FDA advises that there will still be some recalls. Acheson says that “It’s not possible to be inspecting and testing every food item; you simply cannot do it.”

Salmonella outbreak reveals FDA’s inadequacy

The protection of our food supply by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has recently shown to be extremely inadequate, with deadly consequences. Recently, more than 500 people in the U.S. have become sick and at least 8 have passed away from a salmonella outburst that was traced to peanut products.

A extensive analysis of the FDA was ordered on Monday, February 2, President Obama. He said that Americans should be able to trust the government to keep children safe as they eat peanut butter. His own daughter, Sasha, eats it for lunch. It is a shame that it takes a president with a young child at risk for the FDA to begin stringent standards for protecting our food supply.

Jean Halloran, director of Food Policy Initiatives for Consumers Union, says that consumers should be extremely angry. She says “The FDA is supposed to be a watchdog for consumers, and for too long, this agency has been coming up short.”

A Georgia processing plant is to blame for the recent outbreak. A criminal probe has begun because the FDA claims that the company knowingly shipped salmonella contaminated peanut butter out for almost a year. The company often retested the harmful products at a different lab just to get a negative reading.

What’s even more upsetting is that federal inspectors had not been to the Georgia plant since 2001. Also, when Canada held and refused a shipment that had metal fragments in it, the FDA  asked Georgia state inspectors to look at the plant, instead of its own inspectors. No samples were taken for inspection during the two visits. The FDA had to resort to bio-terrorism laws in order to acquire testing records from the company.

Unfortunately, these food safety issues are not unfamiliar to the public. Just last year, there was a jalapeno salmonella outbreak and in 2007, there was a lettuce problem. All this should put the spotlight on a problem that the Obama administration must conquer, which is an inadequate amount of FDA inspectors. There are less than 2000 in the agency. According to one expert, the scarcity of inspectors can often cause food producers to  go an astounding 15 to 20 years between inspections.

Jean Halloran claims that Congress should give power to the agency to order food recalls, to require annual inspections of food processing plants and demand that processors report tests that find infected products. A bill was introduced during the first week of February by a lawmaker that will reorganize federal food safety enforcement and require it to be more responsible. There are four main bills to revise the food safety system currently being constructed.